A little background about why we’re so committed to our breeds and what makes them different:
In 1989, the American Dairy Goat Association significantly modified its Scorecard, which is the set of descriptions judges and breeders use to evaluate goats against the hypothetical ideal. The Type Committee, in its infinite wisdom, implemented an approach that they literally referred to as “put a bag over the head of the goat.” Heads could differ, but all breed body types should be identical. In other words, rather than having the compact and thrifty Lamancha, the deer-like Nubian, the powerful Saanen, and so on, all dairy goats were to look exactly the same except for heads. This, combined with other Type Committee decisions (such as “bigger is better,” another direct quote) and a devaluing of body capacity (and the complete removal of udder capacity as a category), came together to describe a very large, very long goat with a tendency toward being a tube rather than a deep wedge. To breeders, it became clear that the ideal goat should have a small, very high, very compact and tight udder.
This approach succeeded incredibly well, so that within a very few generations all purebred goats (with the possible exception of the Nigerian Dwarf) had the same outline, height, udder shape, topline, etc. The bag-over-the-head vision had come to fruition; aside from color and ears, by the early 2000s there were very few (if any) substantive differences between breeds. In addition, in the show-bred population of dairy goats udders had become substantially smaller and milk production lower as the strong preference for ultra high, tight udders was expressed in breeding decisions.
We are passionately opposed to this approach, and we believe that the Type Committee was both philosophically wrong and factually incorrect.
The justification given for blurring the differences between breeds was that “breed characteristics have no effect on longevity or productivity,” an assertion we now know is totally false. Both genetically and epigenetically, there are big differences between and unique strategies available to varying body types. For example, smaller frames (such as was found in the Lamancha before the scorecard change) generally mean better feed efficiency, and animals with better feed efficiency raise healthier kids, produce more milk per calorie, and are much more profitable.
On the other end of the body-shape spectrum, animals with larger frames but looser skin and narrower barrels (the pre-change Nubian) are more tolerant to heat stress and climate-change stress, and can adjust their feed intake more easily to cope with temperature changes.
Both of these differences lead directly and immediately to how long an animal will be productive in a herd (longevity) and how much the animal contributes to the farm economy (productivity).
And, of course, a cute, high, tight udder that holds two pints of milk maximum on a 150-lb standard-breed goat is pretty much useless, and we believe that dairy goats should be the opposite of useless.
So what are we doing about it? The answer is in the big nitrogen tank downstairs, where we keep the 70s, 80s, and 90s on ice. We are incredibly grateful to wise breeders who kept these “old dead guys” operative over the decades. With every breeding we travel back in time, which is a tremendously exciting (and always surprising!) process. If you’re excited about what we’re doing too, we’d love to help you find the right goats for your family.